CRJ311 Week 3 discussions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

CRJ311 Week 3 discussions - Essay Example Black hair matching the benchmark of the victim will be the first indication that the victim could have been involved, and the suspect could be real. Nevertheless, the possibility of this evidence stands challenge of being circumstantial evidence in a court of law (Robertson & Law, 2007). In a bid to make the case more concrete and formidable, a forensic analysis of the environment of the car will need to be conducted to determine the possibility of the victim having been in the car. Evidences such as fingerprints and body secretion analysis will offer concrete backup of the already present evidence. Additionally, a DNA cross mating in an expertise environment will be used in support of the relationship between the hair and the victim. DNA offers a formidable ground for prosecution thus offering a factual evidence that the suspect was involved in the crime (Devery, 2010). The use of dogs in the criminal investigation has been in existence in the criminal justice for a long time. The use of investigator dogs is as a result of a high developed sense of smell that the dogs have as compared to man. In this relation, in an attempt to improve the efficiency of the investigation, different sub-species of dogs have been employed for this duty owing to the differences in the sense even among the dog species. In most circumstances, arson dogs are used as aids is compilation of pieces of evidence in the determination if fire was accidental or was intentionally caused. The use of these dogs in sniffing inflammable is a time used in a court of law as a proof for intentional cause of the fire. Nevertheless, the main question is the credibility of the findings of the dogs as evidence for conviction. On a personal opinion, the use of evidence from arson dogs in a court of law presents nonfactual ruling. A dog like any other animal could commit